Document - An experience with the application of three nlp tools for the analysis of natural language requirements

2020

Conference article Open Access

An experience with the application of three nlp tools for the analysis of natural language requirements

Arrabito M., Fantechi A., Gnesi S., Semini L.

Natural Language Processing Natural language requirements Ambiguity

We report on the experience made with three Natural Language Processing analysis tools, aimed to compare their performance in detecting ambiguity and under-specification in requirements documents, and to compare them with respect to other qualities like learnability, usability, and efficiency. Two industrial tools, Requirements Scout and QVscribe, and an academic one, QuARS, are compared.

Source: Quality of Information and Communications Technology 13th International Conference, QUATIC 2020, pp. 488–498, Faro, Portugal, 9-11/09/2020

Publisher: Springer, Heidelberg , Germania

Metrics

Back to previous page

Cite as

BibTeX entry

@inproceedings{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:446396,
	title = {An experience with the application of three nlp tools for the analysis of natural language requirements},
	author = {Arrabito M. and Fantechi A. and Gnesi S. and Semini L.},
	publisher = {Springer, Heidelberg , Germania},
	doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_39},
	booktitle = {Quality of Information and Communications Technology 13th International Conference, QUATIC 2020, pp. 488–498, Faro, Portugal, 9-11/09/2020},
	year = {2020}
}