Arrabito M., Fantechi A., Gnesi S., Semini L.
Natural Language Processing Natural language requirements Ambiguity
We report on the experience made with three Natural Language Processing analysis tools, aimed to compare their performance in detecting ambiguity and under-specification in requirements documents, and to compare them with respect to other qualities like learnability, usability, and efficiency. Two industrial tools, Requirements Scout and QVscribe, and an academic one, QuARS, are compared.
Source: Quality of Information and Communications Technology 13th International Conference, QUATIC 2020, pp. 488–498, Faro, Portugal, 9-11/09/2020
Publisher: Springer, Heidelberg , Germania
@inproceedings{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:446396, title = {An experience with the application of three nlp tools for the analysis of natural language requirements}, author = {Arrabito M. and Fantechi A. and Gnesi S. and Semini L.}, publisher = {Springer, Heidelberg , Germania}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-030-58793-2_39}, booktitle = {Quality of Information and Communications Technology 13th International Conference, QUATIC 2020, pp. 488–498, Faro, Portugal, 9-11/09/2020}, year = {2020} }