2018
Journal article  Open Access

Active and passive diffusion processes in complex networks

Milli L., Rossetti G., Pedreschi D., Giannotti F.

Diffusion of information  diffusion processes  Computational Mathematics  Diffusion processes  Complex networks  Computer Networks and Communications  Research  diffusion of information  Multidisciplinary 

Ideas, information, viruses: all of them, with their mechanisms, spread over the complex social information, viruses: all tissues described by our interpersonal relations. Usually, to simulate and understand the unfolding of such complex phenomena are used general mathematical models; these models act agnostically from the object of which they simulate the diffusion, thus considering spreading of virus, ideas and innovations alike. Indeed, such degree of abstraction makes it easier to define a standard set of tools that can be applied to heterogeneous contexts; however, it can also lead to biased, incorrect, simulation outcomes. In this work we introduce the concepts of active and passive diffusion to discriminate the degree in which individuals choice affect the overall spreading of content over a social graph. Moving from the analysis of a well-known passive diffusion schema, the Threshold model (that can be used to model peer-pressure related processes), we introduce two novel approaches whose aim is to provide active and mixed schemas applicable in the context of innovations/ideas diffusion simulation. Our analysis, performed both in synthetic and real-world data, underline that the adoption of exclusively passive/active models leads to conflicting results, thus highlighting the need of mixed approaches to capture the real complexity of the simulated system better.

Source: Applied network science 3 (2018). doi:10.1007/s41109-018-0100-5

Publisher: Springer international, Cham, Svizzera


Aral, S, Muchnik, L, Sundararajan, A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Natl Acad Sci. 2009; 106 (51): 21544-21549
Backstrom, L, Huttenlocher, D, Kleinberg, J, Lan, X. Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution. Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. KDD ’06. 2006: 44-54
Bakshy, E, Rosenn, I, Marlow, C, Adamic, L. The role of social networks in information diffusion. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. WWW ’12. 2012: 519-528
Barabási, A-L, Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999; 286 (5439): 509-512
Burt, RS. Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. Am J Sociol. 1987; 92 (6): 1287-1335
Centola, D. The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science. 2010; 329 (5996): 1194-1197
An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science. 2011; 334 (6060): 1269-1272
Erdös, P, Rényi, A. On random graphs, i. Publ Math Debr. 1959; 6: 290-297
Gleeson, JP, Cahalane, DJ. Seed size strongly affects cascades on random networks. Phys Rev E. 2007; 75 (5): 056103
Granovetter, M. Threshold models of collective behavior. Am J Sociol. 1978; 83 (6): 1420-1443
Havlin, S. Phone infections. Science. 2009; 324 (5930): 1023-1024
Milli, Letizia, Rossetti, Giulio, Pedreschi, Dino, Giannotti, Fosca. Information Diffusion in Complex Networks: The Active/Passive Conundrum. Studies in Computational Intelligence. 2017: 305-313
Rogers, E. Diffusion of Innovations. 2003
Romero, DM, Meeder, B, Kleinberg, J. Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on twitter. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on World wide web. WWW ’11. 2011: 695-704
Rossetti, G, Milli L, Rinzivillo S, Sirbu A, Pedreschi D, Giannotti F (2017) Ndlib: Studying network diffusion dynamics In: Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA), 2017 IEEE International Conference On, 155–164.. IEEE.
Rossetti, G, Milli, L, Rinzivillo, S, Sîrbu, A, Pedreschi, D, Giannotti, F. NDlib: a python library to model and analyze diffusion processes over complex networks. Int J Data Sci Analytics. 2018; 5 (1): 61-79
Ruan, Z, Iniguez, G, Karsai, M, Kertész, J. Kinetics of social contagion. Phys Rev Lett. 2015; 115 (21): 218702
Singh, P, Sreenivasan, S, Szymanski, BK, Korniss, G. Threshold-limited spreading in social networks with multiple initiators. Scientific reports. 2013; 3: 2330
Suri, S, Watts, DJ. Cooperation and contagion in web-based, networked public goods experiments. PloS ONE. 2011; 6 (3): 16836
Szor, P (2004) Fighting computer virus attacks. USENIX.
Toole, JL, Cha, M, González, MC. Modeling the adoption of innovations in the presence of geographic and media influences. PloS ONE. 2012; 7 (1): 29528
Viswanath, B, Mislove, A, Cha, M, Gummadi, KP. On the evolution of user interaction in facebook. Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks. WOSN ’09. 2009: 37-42
Wang, P, González, MC, Menezes, R, Barabási, A-L. Understanding the spread of malicious mobile-phone programs and their damage potential. Int J Inf Secur. 2013; 12 (5): 383-392
Watts, DJ. A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Natl Acad Sci. 2002; 99 (9): 5766-5771
Watts, DJ, Strogatz, SH. Collective dynamics of ’small-world’networks. Nature. 1998; 393 (6684): 440

Metrics



Back to previous page
BibTeX entry
@article{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:424280,
	title = {Active and passive diffusion processes in complex networks},
	author = {Milli L. and Rossetti G. and Pedreschi D. and Giannotti F.},
	publisher = {Springer international, Cham, Svizzera},
	doi = {10.1007/s41109-018-0100-5},
	journal = {Applied network science},
	volume = {3},
	year = {2018}
}

SoBigData
SoBigData Research Infrastructure


OpenAIRE