2022
Report  Open Access

Open Science repository platforms

Manghi P., Artini M., La Bruzzo S., Ottonello E., Pavone G.

Repository  Repository platforms  Repository software  Dryad  DataVerse  DSpace  InvenioRDM 

Institutional and thematic repositories today play a key role in scholarly communication and more broadly in scientific workflows. Many institutions and communities have set the ambitious goal of providing an open access repository for their community of users. However, given the amount of expectations from their users, choosing the right solution is often a non-trivial choice. Some platforms may be served out-of-the-box, to be put in operation after straightforward configurations, but are in general less customizable to adhere to specific functional, non-functional, or contextual needs. Other platforms may be instead extremely customizable and flexible but require skilled personnel for their adaptation and deployment. This report performs an analysis of existing state-of-the-art Open Source repository solutions from the functional, operational, and software perspectives. As a result of the analysis, it will factor out the pros and cons of such solutions and identify typical scenarios of adoption.

Source: ISTI Technical Report, ISTI-2022-TR/009, 2022


Metrics



Back to previous page
BibTeX entry
@techreport{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:466254,
	title = {Open Science repository platforms},
	author = {Manghi P. and Artini M. and La Bruzzo S. and Ottonello E. and Pavone G.},
	doi = {10.32079/isti-tr-2022/009},
	institution = {ISTI Technical Report, ISTI-2022-TR/009, 2022},
	year = {2022}
}

OpenAIRE Nexus
OpenAIRE-Nexus Scholarly Communication Services for EOSC users


OpenAIRE