2020
Report  Open Access

Re-Assessing the" Classify and Count" Quantification Method

Moreo A., Sebastiani F.

re-assesing  quantification  classify and count  hyperparameter optimization  model selection 

Learning to quantify (aka\quantification) is a task concerned with training unbiased estimators of class prevalence via supervised learning. This task originated with the observation that" Classify and Count"(CC), the trivial method of obtaining class prevalence estimates, is often a biased estimator, and thus delivers suboptimal quantification accuracy; following this observation, several methods for learning to quantify have been proposed that have been shown to outperform CC. In this work we contend that previous works have failed to use properly optimised versions of CC. We thus reassess the real merits of CC (and its variants), and argue that, while still inferior to some cutting-edge methods, they deliver near-state-of-the-art accuracy once (a) hyperparameter optimisation is performed, and (b) this optimisation is performed by using a true quantification loss instead of a standard classification-based loss. Experiments on three publicly available binary sentiment classification datasets support these conclusions.

Source: Research report, SoBigData++ and AI4Media, 2020



Back to previous page
BibTeX entry
@techreport{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:438794,
	title = {Re-Assessing the" Classify and Count" Quantification Method},
	author = {Moreo A. and Sebastiani F.},
	institution = {Research report, SoBigData++ and AI4Media, 2020},
	year = {2020}
}
CNR ExploRA

Bibliographic record

ISTI Repository

Deposited version Open Access

Also available from

arxiv.orgOpen Access

AI4Media
A European Excellence Centre for Media, Society and Democracy

SoBigData-PlusPlus
SoBigData++: European Integrated Infrastructure for Social Mining and Big Data Analytics


OpenAIRE