2015
Journal article  Open Access

Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation

Bessi A., Coletto M., Davidescu G. A., Scala A., Caldarelli G., Quattrociocchi W.

Computer Science - Social and Information Networks  FOS: Computer and information sciences  Physics - Physics and Society  Social and Information Networks (cs.SI)  Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)  Computer Science - Human-Computer Interaction  Viral Misinformation  FOS: Physical sciences  Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph)  Research Article  Multidisciplinary 

The large availability of user provided contents on online social media facilitates people aggregation around shared beliefs, interests, worldviews and narratives. In spite of the enthusiastic rhetoric about the so called collective intelligence unsubstantiated rumors and conspiracy theories--e.g., chemtrails, reptilians or the Illuminati--are pervasive in online social networks (OSN). In this work we study, on a sample of 1.2 million of individuals, how information related to very distinct narratives--i.e. main stream scientific and conspiracy news--are consumed and shape communities on Facebook. Our results show that polarized communities emerge around distinct types of contents and usual consumers of conspiracy news result to be more focused and self-contained on their specific contents. To test potential biases induced by the continued exposure to unsubstantiated rumors on users' content selection, we conclude our analysis measuring how users respond to 4,709 troll information--i.e. parodistic and sarcastic imitation of conspiracy theories. We find that 77.92% of likes and 80.86% of comments are from users usually interacting with conspiracy stories.

Source: PloS one 10 (2015). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118093

Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, CA , Stati Uniti d'America


1 Mccombs ME, Shaw DL (1972) The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. The Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–187. 10.1086/267990
2 Rojecki A, Meraz S (2014) Rumors and factitious informational blends: The role of the web in speculative politics. New Media and Society. 10.1177/1461444814535724
3 Allpost G, Postman L (1946) An analysis of rumor. Public Opinion Quarterly 10: 501–517. 10.1086/265813
4 Kuklinski JH, Quirk PJ, Jerit J, Schwieder D, Rich RF (2000) Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics 62: 790–816. 10.1111/0022-3816.00033
5 Bessi A, Caldarelli G, Del Vicario M, Scala A, Quattrociocchi W (2014) Social determinants of content selection in the age of (mis)information. In: Aiello L, McFarland D, editors, Social Informatics, Springer International Publishing, volume 8851 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp. 259–268. URL 10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_18
6 Sunstein CR, Vermeule A (2009) Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 202–227. 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2008.00325.x
7 McKelvey K, Menczer F (2013) Truthy: Enabling the study of online social networks. In: Proc. CSCW’13. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1212.4565.
8 Meade M, Roediger H (2002) Explorations in the s ocial contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition 30: 995–1009. 10.3758/BF03194318 12507365
9 Mann C, Stewart F (2000) Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online (New Technologies for Social Research series). Sage Publications Ltd.
10 Garrett RK, Weeks BE (2013) The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. New York, NY, USA: ACM, CSCW’13, pp. 1047–1058. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2441776.2441895
11 Buckingham Shum S, Aberer K, Schmidt A, Bishop S, Lukowicz P. (2012) Towards a global participatory platform. The European Physical Journal Special Topics 214: 109–152. 10.1140/epjst/e2012-01690-3
12 Centola D (2010) The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329: 1194–1197. 10.1126/science.1185231 20813952
13 Paolucci M, Eymann T, Jager W, Sabater-Mir J, Conte R, et al (2009) Social Knowledge for e-Governance: Theory and Technology of Reputation. Roma: ISTC-CNR.
14 Quattrociocchi W, Conte R, Lodi E (2011) Opinions manipulation: Media, power and gossip. Advances in Complex Systems 14: 567–586. 10.1142/S0219525911003165
15 Quattrociocchi W, Paolucci M, Conte R (2009) On the effects of informational cheating on social evaluations: image and reputation through gossip. IJKL 5: 457–471. 10.1504/IJKL.2009.031509
16 Bekkers V, Beunders H, Edwards A, Moody R (2011) New media, micromobilization, and political agenda setting: Crossover effects in political mobilization and media usage. The Information Society 27: 209–219. 10.1080/01972243.2011.583812
17 Quattrociocchi W, Caldarelli G, Scala A (2014) Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social influence. Scientific Reports 4 10.1038/srep04938 24861995
18 Byford J (2011) Conspiracy Theories: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan URL http://books.google.it/books?id=vV-UhrQaoecC
19 Fine G, Campion-Vincent V, Heath C Rumor Mills: The Social Impact of Rumor and Legend Social problems and social issues. Transaction Publishers URL http://books.google.it/books?id=dADxBwgCF5MC
20 Hogg M, Blaylock D (2011) Extremism and the Psychology of Uncertainty Black-well/Claremont Applied Social Psychology Series. Wiley URL http://books.google.it/books?id=GTgBQ3TPwpAC
21 Bauer M (1997) Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press URL http://books.google.it/books?id=WqlRXkxS36cC
22 Surowiecki J (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. Abacus URL http://books.google.it/books?id=\_EqBQgAACAAJ
23 Welinder P, Branson S, Belongie S, Perona P (2010) The multidimensional wisdom of crowds. In: NIPS. pp. 2424–2432.
24 Howell L (2013) Digital wildfires in a hyperconnected world. In: Report 2013. World Economic Forum.
25 Koriat A, Goldsmith M, Pansky A (2000) Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annu Rev Psychol 51: 481–537. 10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481 10751979
26 Ayers M, Reder L (1998) A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5: 1–21. 10.3758/BF03209454
27 Zhu B, Chen C, Loftus EF, Lin C, He Q, et al (2010) Individual differences in false memory from misinformation: Personality characteristics and their interactions with cognitive abilities. Personality and Individual Differences 48: 889–894. 10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.016
28 Frenda SJ, Nichols RM, Loftus EF (2011) Current Issues and Advances in Misinformation Research. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20: 20–23. 10.1177/0963721410396620
29 Onnela JP, Reed-Tsochas F (2010) Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 18375–18380. 10.1073/pnas.0914572107
30 Ugander J, B L, M C, Kleinberg J (2012) Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
31 Lewis K, Gonzalez M, Kaufman J (2012) Social selection and peer influence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 68–72. 10.1073/pnas.1109739109
32 Mocanu D, Baronchelli A, Gonçalves B, Perra N, Zhang Q, et al (2013) The twitter of babel: Mapping world languages through microblogging platforms. PLOS ONE 8: e61981 10.1371/journal.pone.0061981 23637940
33 Adamic L, Glance N (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 u.s. election: Divided they blog. In: In LinkKDD?05: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery. pp. 36–43.
34 Kleinberg J (2013) Analysis of large-scale social and information networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 371 10.1098/rsta.2012.0378
35 Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer ADI, Marlow C, et al (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489: 295–298. 10.1038/nature11421 22972300
36 Borge-Holthoefer J, Rivero A, García I, CauhéE, Ferrer A, et al (2011) Structural and dynamical patterns on online social networks: The spanish may 15th movement as a case study. PLoS One 6: e23883 10.1371/journal.pone.0023883 21886834
37 Castellano C, Fortunato S, Loreto V (2009) Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 81: 591+. 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.591
38 Ben-naim E, Krapivsky PL, Vazquez F, Redner S (2003) Unity and discord in opinion dynamics. Physica A. 10.1016/j.physa.2003.08.027
39 Friggeri A, Adamic L, Eckles D, Cheng J (2014) Rumor Cascades. AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM).
40 Hannak A, Margolin D, Keegan B, Weber I (2014) Get Back! You Don’t Know Me Like That: The Social Mediation of Fact Checking Interventions in Twitter Conversations In: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’14). Ann Arbor, MI.
41 Cheng J, Adamic L, Dow PA, Kleinberg JM, Leskovec J (2014) Can cascades be predicted? In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, WWW’14, pp. 925–936. URL 10.1145/2566486.2567997
42 Mocanu D, Rossi L, Zhang Q, Karsai M, Quattrociocchi W (2014) Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. Computers in Human Behavior.
43 Bessi A, Scala A, Zhang Q, Rossi L, Quattrociocchi W(to appear) The economy of attention in the age of (mis)information. Journal of Trust Management.
44 simplyhumans (2014). Sim ply humans—benefic effect of lemons. Website. URL https://www.facebook.com/HumanlyHuman/photos/a.468232656606293.1073741826.466607330102159/494359530660272/?type=1&theater. Last checked: 31.07.2014.
45 simplyhumans (2014). Dieta personalizzata—benefit and effect of lemons. Website. URL https://www.facebook.com/dietapersonalizzata/photos/a.114020932014769.26792.113925262024336/627614477322076/?type=1&theater. Last checked: 31.07.2014.
46 simplyhumans (2014). Simply humans—benefic effect of lemons. Website. URL https://www.facebook.com/HumanlyHuman/photos/a.468232656606293.1073741826.466607330102159/494343470661878/?type=1&theater. Last checked: 31.07.2014.
47 Ambrosetti G (2013). I forconi: “il senato ha approvato una legge per i parlamentari in crisi”. chi non verrà rieletto, oltre alla buonuscita, si beccherà altri soldi. sarà vero? Website. URL http://www.linksicilia.it/2013/08/i-forconi-il-senato-ha-approvato-una-legge-per-i-parlamentari-in-crisi-chi-non-verra-rieletto-oltre-alla-buonuscita-si-becchera-altri-soldi-sara-vero/ Last checked: 19.01.2014.
48 Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2007) The benefits of facebook? friends:? social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12: 1143–1168. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
49 Joinson AN (2008) Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of facebook In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, CHI’08, pp. 1027–1036. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1357054.1357213
50 Viswanath B, Mislove A, Cha M, Gummadi KP (2009) On the evolution of user interaction in facebook In: Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks. New York, NY, USA: ACM, WOSN’09, pp. 37–42. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1592665.1592675
51 Deffuant G, Neau D, Amblard F, Weisbuch G (2001) Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advances in Complex Systems 3: 87–98. 10.1142/S0219525900000078
52 Patrick J Leman MC (2013). Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. URL http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378/full.
53 Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, Heier H (1996) Individual differences in intuitive?experiential and analytical?rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 390–405. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390 8765488
54 Webster DM, Kruglanski AW (1994) Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 1049–1062. 10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049 7815301
55 Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008). Fast unfolding of community hierarchies in large networks. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0476. 0803.0476.
56 Clauset A, Newman MEJ, Moore C (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E: 1–6.
57 Slate (2014). Study explains why your stupid facebook friends are so gullible. URL http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_world_/2014/03/18/facebook_and_misinformation_study_explains_why_your_stupid_facebook_friends.html.
58 Global Polis (2014). Facebook, trolls, and italian politics. URL http://www.globalpolis.org/facebook-trolls-italian-politics/.
59 Atran S, Ginges J (2012) Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science 336: 855–857. 10.1126/science.1216902 22605762
60 Lewandowsky S, Cook J, Oberauer K, Marriott M (2013) Recursive fury: C onspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation. Frontiers in Psychology 4 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00073 23508808
61 Facebook (2013). Using the graph api. Website. URL https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/using-graph-api/. Last checked: 19.01.2014.
1. Mocanu D, Rossi L, Zhang Q, Karsai M, Quattrociocchi W (2014) Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. CoRR abs/1403.3344.
2. simplyhumans (2014). Simply humans - bene c e ect of lemons. Website. https://www.facebook.com/HumanlyHuman/photos/a.468232656606293.1073741826. 466607330102159/494359530660272/?type=1&theater. Last checked: 31.07.2014.
3. simplyhumans (2014). Dieta peronalizzata - bene c e ect of lemons. Website. URL https://www.facebook.com/dietapersonalizzata/photos/a.114020932014769.26792. 113925262024336/627614477322076/?type=1&theater. Last checked: 31.07.2014.
4. simplyhumans (2014). Simply humans - bene c e ect of lemons. Website. https://www.facebook.com/HumanlyHuman/photos/a.468232656606293.1073741826. 466607330102159/494343470661878/?type=1&theater. Last checked: 31.07.2014.
5. Ambrosetti G (2013). I forconi: il senato ha approvato una legge per i parlamentari in crisi. chi non verr rieletto, oltre alla buonuscita, si beccher altri soldi. sar vero? Website. URL http://www.linksicilia.it/2013/08/ i-forconi-il-senato-ha-approvato-una-legge-per-i-parlamentari-in-crisi-chi-non-verra-rieletto Last checked: 19.01.2014.
6. Byford J (2011) Conspiracy Theories: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. URL http: //books.google.it/books?id=vV-UhrQaoecC.
7. Fine G, Campion-Vincent V, Heath C Rumor Mills: The Social Impact of Rumor and Legend. Social problems and social issues. Transaction Publishers. URL http://books.google.it/books? id=dADxBwgCF5MC.
8. Hogg M, Blaylock D (2011) Extremism and the Psychology of Uncertainty. Blackwell/Claremont Applied Social Psychology Series. Wiley. URL http://books.google.it/books? id=GTgBQ3TPwpAC.
9. Bauer M (1997) Resistance to New Technology: Nuclear Power, Information Technology and Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press. URL http://books.google.it/books?id= WqlRXkxS36cC.
10. Surowiecki J (2005) The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter Than the Few. Abacus. URL http://books.google.it/books?id=_EqBQgAACAAJ.
11. Welinder P, Branson S, Belongie S, Perona P (2010) The multidimensional wisdom of crowds. In: NIPS. pp. 2424-2432.
12. Howell L (2013) Digital wild res in a hyperconnected world. In: Report 2013. World Economic Forum.
13. Garrett RK, Weeks BE (2013) The promise and peril of real-time corrections to political misperceptions. In: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. New York, NY, USA: ACM, CSCW '13, pp. 1047{1058. doi:10.1145/2441776.2441895. URL http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2441776.2441895.
14. Meade M, Roediger H (2002) Explorations in the social contagion of memory. Memory & Cognition 30: 995-1009.
15. Koriat A, Goldsmith M, Pansky A (2000) Toward a psychology of memory accuracy. Annu Rev Psychol 51: 481{537.
16. Ayers M, Reder L (1998) A theoretical review of the misinformation e ect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5: 1{21.
17. Zhu B, Chen C, Loftus EF, Lin C, He Q, et al. (2010) Individual di erences in false memory from misinformation: Personality characteristics and their interactions with cognitive abilities. Personality and Individual Di erences 48: 889 - 894.
18. Frenda SJ, Nichols RM, Loftus EF (2011) Current Issues and Advances in Misinformation Research. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20: 20{23.
19. Khosla A, Das Sarma A, Hamid R (2014) What makes an image popular? In: Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on World wide web. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, pp. 867{876. URL http://scholar.google. de/scholar.bib?q=info:k376pwv25OAJ:scholar.google.com/&output=citation&scisig= AAGBfm0AAAAAU0eUyD75vd2ZWQ0kfIZrbC6bxRCgTX3t&scisf=4&hl=de.
20. Onnela JP, Reed-Tsochas F (2010) Spontaneous emergence of social in uence in online systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107: 18375{18380.
21. Ugander J, Backstrom L, Marlow C, Kleinberg J (2012) Structural diversity in social contagion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences .
22. Lewis K, Gonzalez M, Kaufman J (2012) Social selection and peer in uence in an online social network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 68{72.
23. Mocanu D, Baronchelli A, Goncalves B, Perra N, Zhang Q, et al. (2013) The twitter of babel: Mapping world languages through microblogging platforms. PLOS ONE 8: e61981.
24. Adamic L, Glance N (2005) The political blogosphere and the 2004 u.s. election: Divided they blog. In: In LinkKDD 05: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Link discovery. pp. 36{43.
25. Kleinberg J (2013) Analysis of large-scale social and information networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 371.
26. Paolucci M, Eymann T, Jager W, Sabater-Mir J, Conte R, et al. (2009) Social Knowledge for e-Governance: Theory and Technology of Reputation. Roma: ISTC-CNR.
27. Quattrociocchi W, Conte R, Lodi E (2011) Opinions manipulation: Media, power and gossip. Advances in Complex Systems 14: 567-586.
28. Quattrociocchi W, Paolucci M, Conte R (2009) On the e ects of informational cheating on social evaluations: image and reputation through gossip. IJKL 5: 457-471.
29. Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer ADI, Marlow C, et al. (2012) A 61-million-person experiment in social in uence and political mobilization. Nature 489: 295{298.
30. Borge-Holthoefer J, Rivero A, Garc a I, Cauhe E, Ferrer A, et al. (2011) Structural and dynamical patterns on online social networks: The spanish may 15th movement as a case study. PLoS One 6: e23883.
31. Centola D (2010) The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science 329: 1194{1197.
32. Castellano C, Fortunato S, Loreto V (2009) Statistical physics of social dynamics. Reviews of Modern Physics 81: 591+.
33. Quattrociocchi W, Caldarelli G, Scala A (2014) Opinion dynamics on interacting networks: media competition and social in uence. Scienti c Reports 4.
34. Ben-naim E, Krapivsky PL, Vazquez F, Redner S (2003) Unity and discord in opinion dynamics. Physica A .
35. Rumor Cascades. AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM) .
36. Hannak A, Margolin D, Keegan B, Weber I (2014) Get Back! You Don't Know Me Like That: The Social Mediation of Fact Checking Interventions in Twitter Conversations. In: Proceedings of the 8th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM'14). Ann Arbor, MI.
37. Cheng J, Adamic L, Dow PA, Kleinberg JM, Leskovec J (2014) Can cascades be predicted? In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, WWW '14, pp. 925{936. doi:10.1145/2566486.2567997. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2566486. 2567997.
38. Bogart LM, Thorburn S (2005) Are HIV/AIDS conspiracy beliefs a barrier to HIV prevention among african americans? J Acquir Immune De c Syndr 38: 213{8.
39. Kalichman SC (2009) Denying aids: Conspiracy theories, pseudoscience, and human tragedy : 228.
40. Ellison NB, Stein eld C, Lampe C (2007) The bene ts of facebook friends: social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12: 1143{1168.
41. Joinson AN (2008) Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: Motives and use of facebook. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, CHI '08, pp. 1027{1036. doi:10.1145/1357054.1357213. URL http://doi.acm. org/10.1145/1357054.1357213.
42. Viswanath B, Mislove A, Cha M, Gummadi KP (2009) On the evolution of user interaction in facebook. In: Proceedings of the 2Nd ACM Workshop on Online Social Networks. New York, NY, USA: ACM, WOSN '09, pp. 37{42. doi:10.1145/1592665.1592675. URL http://doi.acm.org/10. 1145/1592665.1592675.
43. Facebook (2013). Using the graph api. Website. URL https://developers.facebook.com/docs/ graph-api/using-graph-api/. Last checked: 19.01.2014.
44. Patrick J Leman MC (2013). Beliefs in conspiracy theories and the need for cognitive closure. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00378. URL http://www.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013. 00378/full.
45. Epstein S, Pacini R, Denes-Raj V, Heier H (1996) Individual di erences in intuitiveexperiential and analyticalrational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 390{405.
46. Webster DM, Kruglanski AW (1994) Individual di erences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67: 1049{1062.
47. Blondel VD, Guillaume JL, Lambiotte R, Lefebvre E (2008). Fast unfolding of community hierarchies in large networks. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.0476. 0803.0476.
48. Clauset A, Newman MEJ, , Moore C (2004) Finding community structure in very large networks. Physical Review E : 1- 6.
49. Atran S, Ginges J (2012) Religious and sacred imperatives in human con ict. Science 336: 855{857.
50. Lewandowsky S, Cook J, Oberauer K, Marriott M (2013) Recursive fury: Conspiracist ideation in the blogosphere in response to research on conspiracist ideation. Frontiers in Psychology 4.

Metrics



Back to previous page
BibTeX entry
@article{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:319708,
	title = {Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation},
	author = {Bessi A. and Coletto M. and Davidescu G.  A. and Scala A. and Caldarelli G. and Quattrociocchi W.},
	publisher = {Public Library of Science, San Francisco, CA , Stati Uniti d'America},
	doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0118093 and 10.48550/arxiv.1408.1667},
	journal = {PloS one},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2015}
}

DOLFINS
Distributed Global Financial Systems for Society

SIMPOL
Financial Systems Simulation and Policy Modelling

MULTIPLEX
Foundational Research on MULTIlevel comPLEX networks and systems


OpenAIRE