Document - ModeLLer - a prototype to support requirements elicitation in co-design environments

2023

Conference article Open Access

ModeLLer - a prototype to support requirements elicitation in co-design environments

Mannari C., Anichini E., Bacco F. M., Ferrari A., Turchi T., Malizia A.

Process modelling No-code end-user development End-user development Requirements elicitation no-code Socio-technical systems requirements elicitation socio-technical systems

This contribution presents ModeLLer, a prototype of a web tool for system modelling based on a block-based visual editor. The aim of ModeLLer is to enable collaborative environments in requirements elicitation, allowing end-users to create UML class diagrams without any knowledge of the (semi-)formal UML notation.

Citations

[1] M. Dumas , M. La Rosa , J. Mendling and H. A. Reijers, “Fundamentals of Business Process Management”. Springer, 2018.
[2] C. Mannari, G. O. Spagnolo, M. Bacco and A. Malizia “Digitalisation of Agriculture: Development and Evaluation of a Model-based Requirements Engineering Process”, REFSQ 2023 - 29th International Working Conference on Requirement Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality: Posters and Tools, Barcelona, Spain, 17-20/04/2023, 2023.
[3] S. Leminen, M. Westerlund, and AG. Nystro¨m, “Living labs as openinnovation networks”, 2012.
[4] G. Fischer and E. Giaccardi, “Meta-design: A framework for the future of end-user development”, in End user development, 2006, pp. 427-457.
[5] H. Lieberman, F. Paterno`, M. Klann and V. Wulf, “End-User Development: An Emerging Paradigm”, End User Development, 2006.
[6] A. Ferrari, P. Spoletini and S. Gnesi, “Ambiguity and tacit knowledge in requirements elicitation interviews”. Requirements Engineering 21, 2016.
[7] D.M. Ferna´ndez, S. Wagner, M. Kalinowski, M. Felderer, P. Mafra, A. Vetro`, T. Conte, M.-T. Christiansson, D. Greer, C. Lassenius, T. Ma¨nnisto¨, M. Nayabi, M. Oivo, B. Penzenstadler, D. Pfahl, R. Prikladnicki, G. Ruhe, A. Schekelmann, S. Sen, R. Spinola, A. Tuzcu, J. L. de la Vara and R. Wieringa “Naming the pain in requirements engineering”. Empirical Software Engineering 22, 2017.
[8] “Unified Modeling Language (UML) 2.5.1 Core Specification”, Version 2. https://www.omg.org/spec/UML, 2017 - Online; accessed 9 June 2023.
[9] “XML Metadata Interchange (XMI)”, Version 2.5.1. https://www.omg.org/spec/XMI, 2015 - Online; accessed 9 June 2023.
[10] Google, “Blockly”, https://developers.google.com/blockly?hl=it, 2022 - Online; accessed 9 June 2023.
[11] Nielsen Norman Group, “Evaluate interface learnability with cognitive walkthroughs”, https://www.nngroup.com/articles/cognitivewalkthroughs/, 2022 - Online; accessed 9 June 2023.
[12] Nielsen Norman Group, “How to conduct a cognitive walkthrough workshop”. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/cognitive-walkthroughworkshop, 2022 - Online; accessed 4 May 2023.
[13] “PlantUML”, https://plantuml.com - Online; accessed 9 June 2023.

Metrics

Back to previous page

Cite as

BibTeX entry

@inproceedings{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:484673,
	title = {ModeLLer - a prototype to support requirements elicitation in co-design environments},
	author = {Mannari C. and Anichini E. and Bacco F.  M. and Ferrari A. and Turchi T. and Malizia A.},
	doi = {10.1109/re57278.2023.00055},
	year = {2023}
}