2009
Journal article  Restricted

Benefits and risks of using electrodynamic tethers to de-orbit spacecraft

Pardini C., Hanada T., Krisko P. H.

Spacecraft de-orbiting  Electrodynamic tethers  Model checking  Tether survivability concerns  Aerospace Engineering  Groupware systems  Orbital debris mitigation 

By using electrodynamic drag to greatly increase the orbital decay rate, an electrodynamic space tether can remove spent or dysfunctional spacecraft from low Earth orbit (LEO) rapidly and safely. Moreover, the low mass requirements of such tether devices make them highly advantageous compared to conventional rocket-based de-orbit systems. However, a tether system is much more vulnerable to space debris impacts than a typical spacecraft and its design must be proved to be safe up to a certain confidence level before being adopted for potential applications. To assess space debris related concerns, in March 2001 a new task (Action Item 19.1) on the "Potential Benefits and Risks of Using Electrodynamic Tethers for End-of-life De-orbit of LEO Spacecraft" was defined by the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC). Two tests were proposed to compute the fatal impact rate of meteoroids and orbital debris on space tethers in circular orbits, at different altitudes and inclinations, as a function of the tether diameter to assess the survival probability of an electrodynamic tether system during typical de-orbiting missions. IADC members from three agencies, the Italian Space Agency (ASI), the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and the US National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), participated in the study and different computational approaches were specifically developed within the framework of the IADC task. This paper summarizes the content of the IADC AI 19.1 Final Report. In particular, it introduces the potential benefits and risks of using tethers in space, it describes the assumptions made in the study plan, it compares and discusses the results obtained by ASI, JAXA and NASA for the two tests proposed. Some general conclusions and recommendations are finally extrapolated from this massive and intensive piece of research.

Source: Acta astronautica 64 (2009): 571–588. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.10.007

Publisher: Pergamon Press., Elmsford, N.Y., Stati Uniti d'America


Metrics



Back to previous page
BibTeX entry
@article{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:44264,
	title = {Benefits and risks of using electrodynamic tethers to de-orbit spacecraft},
	author = {Pardini C. and Hanada T. and Krisko P.  H.},
	publisher = {Pergamon Press., Elmsford, N.Y., Stati Uniti d'America},
	doi = {10.1016/j.actaastro.2008.10.007 and 10.2514/6.iac-06-b6.2.10},
	journal = {Acta astronautica},
	volume = {64},
	pages = {571–588},
	year = {2009}
}