[1] Ahmad Wali Ahmad-Yar and Tuba Bircan. Anatomy of a misfit: International migration statistics. Sustainability, 13(7):4032, 2021.
[2] Bedoor K AlShebli, Talal Rahwan, and Wei Lee Woon. The preeminence of ethnic diversity in scientific collaboration. Nature communications, 9(1):1-10, 2018.
[3] Valeria Aman. A new bibliometric approach to measure knowledge transfer of internationally mobile scientists. Scientometrics, 117(1):227-247, 2018.
[4] S. Appelt, B. van Beuzekom, F. GalindoRueda, and R. de Pinho. Which factors influence the international mobility of research scientists? 2015.
[5] A BARABAaSI, H Jeong, Z N´eda, et al. Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Sta-tistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3):590- 614, 2002.
[6] Albert-La´szlo´ Baraba´si, R´eka Albert, and Hawoong Jeong. Scale-free characteristics of random networks: the topology of the worldwide web. Physica A: statistical mechanics and its applications, 281(1-4):69-77, 2000.
[7] B B¨onisch-Brednich. Rituals of encounter: campus life, liminality and being the familiar stranger. Crossing boundaries and weaving intercultural work, life, and scholarship in globalizing universities, pages 118-130, 2016.
[8] Judy F Burnham. Scopus database: a review. Biomedical digital libraries, 3(1):1-8, 2006.
[9] Clara Calero, Thed van Leeuwen, and Robert Tijssen. Research cooperation within the biopharmaceutical industry: Network analyses of co-publications within and between firms. Scientometrics, 71(1):87-99, 2007.
[10] Carolina Can˜ibano. Scientific mobility and economic assumptions: From the allocation of scientists to the socioeconomics of network transformation. Science as Culture, 26(4):505-519, 2017.
[11] Zaida Chinchilla-Rodr´ıguez, Lili Miao, Dakota Murray, Nicol´as Robinson-Garc´ıa, Rodrigo Costas, and Cassidy R Sugimoto. A global comparison of scientific mobility and collaboration according to national scientific capacities. Frontiers in research metrics and analytics, 3:17, 2018.
[12] Sonia Conchi and Carolin Michels. Scientific mobility: An analysis of germany, austria, france and great britain. Technical report, Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers-Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis, 2014.
[13] Marco Conti. Dynamics of scientific collaboration networks due to academic migrations. In Social Informatics: 12th International Conference, SocInfo 2020, Pisa, Italy, October 6-9, 2020, Proceedings, volume 12467, page 283. Springer Nature, 2020.
[14] Suhendry Effendy and Roland HC Yap. Investigations on rating computer sciences conferences: An experiment with the microsoft academic graph dataset. In Proceedings of the 25th international conference companion on world wide web, pages 425-430, 2016.
[15] Suhendry Effendy and Roland HC Yap. Analysing trends in computer science research: A preliminary study using the microsoft academic graph. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pages 1245-1250, 2017.
[16] Johannah Fahey and Jane Kenway. International academic mobility: Problematic and possible paradigms. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 31(5):563-575, 2010.
[17] Michael Fa¨rber. The microsoft academic knowledge graph: A linked data source with 8 billion triples of scholarly data. In International Semantic Web Conference, pages 113-129. Springer, 2019.
[18] Takao Furukawa, Nobuyuki Shirakawa, and Kumi Okuwada. Quantitative analysis of collaborative and mobility networks. Scientometrics, 87(3):451-466, 2011.
[19] Saeed-Ul Hassan, Anna Visvizi, and Hajra Waheed. The 'who'and the 'what'in international migration research: data-driven analysis of scopus-indexed scientific literature. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(9):924-939, 2019.
[20] Drahomira Herrmannova and Petr Knoth. An analysis of the microsoft academic graph. D-lib Magazine, 22(9/10), 2016.
[21] Koen Jonkers and Robert Tijssen. Chinese researchers returning home: Impacts of international mobility on research collaboration and scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 77(2):309-333, 2008.
[22] Samiya Khan, Xiufeng Liu, Kashish A Shakil, and Mansaf Alam. A survey on scholarly data: From big data perspective. Information Processing & Management, 53(4):923-944, 2017.
[23] Terri Kim. Academic mobility, transnational identity capital, and stratification under conditions of academic capitalism. Higher Education, 73(6):981-997, 2017.
[24] Sin Yee Koh and I Lin Sin. Academic and teacher expatriates: Mobilities, positionalities, and subjectivities. Geography Compass, 14(5):e12487, 2020.
[25] Jean-Baptiste Meyer. Network approach versus brain drain: lessons from the diaspora. International migration, 39(5):91-110, 2001.
[26] Andrea Miranda-Gonz´alez, Samin Aref, Tom Theile, and Emilio Zagheni. Scholarly migration within mexico: analyzing internal migration among researchers using scopus longitudinal bibliometric data. EPJ Data Science, 9(1):34, 2020.
[27] Henk F. Moed, M'hamed Aisati, and Andrew Plume. Studying scientific migration in Scopus. Scientometrics, 94(3):929-942, jul 2013.
[28] Henk F Moed, M'hamed Aisati, and Andrew Plume. Studying scientific migration in scopus. Scientometrics, 94(3):929-942, 2013.
[29] Henk F Moed and Gali Halevi. A bibliometric approach to tracking international scientific migration. Scientometrics, 101(3):1987-2001, 2014.
[30] Izabela Moise, Edward Gaere, Ruben Merz, Stefan Koch, and Evangelos Pournaras. Tracking Language Mobility in the Twitter Landscape. In IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops, ICDMW, volume 0, pages 663-670. IEEE Computer Society, jul 2016.
[31] Louise Morley, Nafsika Alexiadou, Stela Garaz, Jos´e Gonz´alez-Monteagudo, and Marius Taba. Internationalisation and migrant academics: the hidden narratives of mobility. Higher Education, 76(3):537-554, 2018.
[32] Francis Narin, Kimberly Stevens, and Edith S Whitlow. Scientific co-operation in europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3):313-323, 1991.
[33] M. E.J. Newman. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98(2):404-409, jan 2001.
[34] Michael Norris and Charles Oppenheim. Comparing alternatives to the web of science for coverage of the social sciences' literature. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2):161-169, 2007.
[35] Gergely Palla, Albert-La´szlo´ Baraba´si, and Tam´as Vicsek. Quantifying social group evolution. Nature, 446(7136):664-667, 2007.
[36] George Panagopoulos, Christos Xypolopoulos, Konstantinos Skianis, Christos Giatsidis, Jie Tang, and Michalis Vazirgiannis. Scientometrics for success and influence in the microsoft academic graph. In International Conference on Complex Networks and Their Applications, pages 1007-1017. Springer, 2019.
[37] Bartosz Paszcza. Comparison of Microsoft academic (graph) with web of science, scopus and google scholar. PhD thesis, University of Southampton, 2016.
[38] N. Perra, B. Gon¸calves, R. Pastor-Satorras, and A. Vespignani. Activity driven modeling of time varying networks. Scientific Reports, 2(1):1-7, jun 2012.
[39] Susan L Robertson. Critical response to special section: International academic mobility. Discourse: Studies in the cultural politics of education, 31(5):641-647, 2010.
[40] Nicol´as Robinson-Garcia, Cassidy R Sugimoto, Dakota Murray, Alfredo YegrosYegros, Vincent Larivi`ere, and Rodrigo Costas. The many faces of mobility: Using bibliometric data to measure the movement of scientists. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1):50-63, 2019.
[41] M Rostan and E Hohle. The international mobility of faculty, the internationalisation of the academy: Changes, realities and prospects. The changing academy-The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective, 10, 2014.
[42] Roberta Sinatra, Dashun Wang, Pierre Deville, Chaoming Song, and Albert La´szlo´ Baraba´si. Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact. Science, 354(6312), nov 2016.
[43] Arnab Sinha, Zhihong Shen, Yang Song, Hao Ma, Darrin Eide, Bo-June Hsu, and Kuansan Wang. An overview of microsoft academic service (mas) and applications. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web, pages 243-246, 2015.
[44] Alina Sˆırbu, Gennady Andrienko, Natalia Andrienko, Chiara Boldrini, Marco Conti, Fosca Giannotti, Riccardo Guidotti, Simone Bertoli, Jisu Kim, Cristina Ioana Muntean, Luca Pappalardo, Andrea Passarella, Dino Pedreschi, Laura Pollacci, Francesca Pratesi, and Rajesh Sharma. Human migration: the big data perspective. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, pages 1-20, mar 2020.
[45] Alexander Subbotin and Samin Aref. Brain drain and brain gain in russia: Analyzing international migration of researchers by discipline using scopus bibliometric data 1996- 2020. arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.03129, 2020.
[46] Ulrich Teichler. Academic mobility and migration: What we know and what we do not know. European Review, 23(S1):S6-S37, 2015.
[47] Giacomo Vaccario, Luca Verginer, and Frank Schweitzer. The mobility network of scientists: analyzing temporal correlations in scientific careers. Applied Network Science, 5(1):1-14, 2020.
[48] Richard Van Noorden. Global mobility: Science on the move. Nature, 490(7420):326- 329, oct 2012.
[49] Caroline S Wagner and Koen Jonkers. Open countries have strong science. Nature News, 550(7674):32, 2017.
[50] Kuansan Wang, Zhihong Shen, Chiyuan Huang, Chieh-Han Wu, Yuxiao Dong, and Anshul Kanakia. Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1):396-413, 2020.
[51] Frans Willekens, Douglas Massey, James Raymer, and Cris Beauchemin. International migration under the microscope. Science, 352(6288):897-899, 2016.
[52] Fuyuki Yoshikane and Kyo Kageura. Comparative analysis of coauthorship networks of different domains: The growth and change of networks. Scientometrics, 60(3):435-446, 2004.
[53] Zhenyue Zhao, Yi Bu, Lele Kang, Chao Min, Yiyang Bian, Li Tang, and Jiang Li. An investigation of the relationship between scientists' mobility to/from china and their research performance. Journal of Informetrics, 14(2):101037, 2020.