2017
Conference article  Open Access

Reputation evaluation of georeferenced data for crowd-sensed applications

Gusmini M., Jabeur N., Karam R., Melchiori M., Renso C.

General Environmental Science  Volunteered Geographic Information  Voluteer geographic information  Social Sensors  User generated content  Reputation Evaluation  Tourism Planning  Reputation evaluation  General Earth and Planetary Sciences  Mobile Crowdsourcing 

Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) is a process where individuals, supported by enabling technologies, behave like physical sensors to harvest georeferenced content in their surroundings. The value of this, typically heterogeneous, content has been recognized by both researchers and organizations. However, in order to be fruitfully used in various VGI-based types of application reliability and quality of particular VGI content (i.e., Points of Interest) have to be assessed. This evaluation can be based on reputation scores that summarize users' experiences with the specific content. Following this direction, our contribution provides, primarily, a new comprehensive model and a multi-layer architecture for reputation evaluation aimed to assess quality of VGI content. Secondly, we demonstrate the relevance of adopting such a framework through an applicative scenario for recommending touristic itineraries.

Source: ANT 2017 - 8th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies, pp. 656–663, Madeira, Portugal, 16-19 May 2017


1. Jamal Jokar Arsanjani, Peter Mooney, Alexander Zipf, and Anne Schauss. Quality assessment of the contributed land use information from openstreetmap versus authoritative datasets. In OpenStreetMap in GIScience, pages 37-58. Springer, 2015.
2. Mohamed Bishr and Werner Kuhn. Trust and reputation models for quality assessment of human sensor observations. In Thora Tenbrink, John Stell, Antony Galton, and Zena Wood, editors, Spatial Information Theory: 11th International Conference, COSIT 2013, Scarborough, UK, September 2-6, 2013. Proceedings, pages 53-73. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2013.
3. Gloria Bordogna, Paola Carrara, Laura Criscuolo, Monica Pepe, and Anna Rampini. A linguistic decision making approach to assess the quality of volunteer geographic information for citizen science. Information Sciences, 258:312 - 327, 2014.
4. Boubaker Boulekrouche, Nafaâ Jabeur, and Zaia Alimazighi. Toward integrating grid and cloud-based concepts for an enhanced deployment of spatial data warehouses in cyber-physical system applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 7(4):475-487, 2016.
5. Igo Ramalho Brilhante, Jose Antonio Macedo, Franco Maria Nardini, Ra aele Perego, and Chiara Renso. On planning sightseeing tours with tripbuilder. Information Processing & Management, 51(2):1 - 15, 2015.
6. Maria Antonia Brovelli, Marco Minghini, and Giorgio Zamboni. Public participation in GIS via mobile applications. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 114:306 - 315, 2016.
7. Fausto D'Antonio, Paolo Fogliaroni, and Tomi Kauppinen. VGI edit history reveals data trustworthiness and user reputation. In 17th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science (Short Paper), 2014.
8. Jennifer Gabrys, Helen Pritchard, and Benjamin Barratt. Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3(2):2053951716679677, 2016.
9. Michael F Goodchild. Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4):211-221, 2007.
10. Michael F. Goodchild and Linna Li. Assuring the quality of volunteered geographic information. Spatial Statistics, 1:110 - 120, 2012.
11. Denis Havlik, Javier Soriano, Carolos Granell, Stuart E. Middleton, Hylke van der Schaaf, Arne Berre, and Jasmin Pielorz. Future internet enablers for VGI applications. In EnviroInfo 2013. September 2013.
12. Peter Mooney, Padraig Corcoran, and Blazej Ciepluch. The potential for using volunteered geographic information in pervasive health computing applications. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 4(6):731-745, 2013.
13. Hansi Senaratne, Amin Mobasheri, Ahmed Loai Ali, Cristina Capineri, and Muki Haklay. A review of volunteered geographic information quality assessment methods. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, May 2016.
14. Wanita Sherchan, Surya Nepal, and Cecile Paris. A survey of trust in social networks. ACM Comput. Surv., 45(4):47:1-47:33, August 2013.
15. Cao Xiao, David Mandell Freeman, and Theodore Hwa. Detecting clusters of fake accounts in online social networks. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security, AISec '15, pages 91-101, New York, NY, USA, 2015. ACM.
16. B. Ye and Y. Wang. Crowdrec: Trust-aware worker recommendation in crowdsourcing environments. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pages 1-8, June 2016.
17. H. Yu, Z. Shen, C. Leung, C. Miao, and V. R. Lesser. A survey of multi-agent trust management systems. IEEE Access, 1:35-50, 2013.
18. Yijiang Zhao, Xiaoguang Zhou, Guangqiang Li, and Hanfa Xing. A Spatio-Temporal VGI Model Considering Trust-Related Information. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 5(2):10, 2016.
8 Rise of the citizen scientist, http://www.nature.com/news/rise-of-the-citizen-scientist-1.18192

Metrics



Back to previous page
BibTeX entry
@inproceedings{oai:it.cnr:prodotti:384701,
	title = {Reputation evaluation of georeferenced data for crowd-sensed applications},
	author = {Gusmini M. and Jabeur N. and Karam R. and Melchiori M. and Renso C.},
	doi = {10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.372},
	booktitle = {ANT 2017 - 8th International Conference on Ambient Systems, Networks and Technologies, pp. 656–663, Madeira, Portugal, 16-19 May 2017},
	year = {2017}
}